On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 09:08 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 18:56 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > > Stephen, > > > > Any new Patches for LTP-Selinux ? > > I don't have any updates, no. > > I have noticed that on x86_64, there are a number of FAILs that are not > present on x86, in particular in the System V IPC tests (msg, sem, shm). > I don't know if that has always been the case or not, as the tests were > all originally written and tested on x86 only.
Turing this on to Jeff and Sergei, who used these test cases a lot on their machines. --Subrata > > > Regards-- > > Subrata > > > > On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 07:20 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote: > > > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 18:21 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > > Here is a patch against this morning's ltp cvs snapshot to implement > > > > Stephen's suggestion of setting expand-check=0 for the duration of > > > > the policy load. This allowed me to get rid of the hack > > > > ++domain_type(test_create_no_t) in refpolicy/test_task_create.te, also > > > > done in this patch. > > > > > > > > (I think it also inlines a patch Stephen sent on jan 23 which > > > > wasn't yet in ltp cvs) > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Ltp-list mailing list > > Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
