[my previous mail seems to be stuck in some ltp moderation system]

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 08:52:07AM +0100, Sebastien Dugue wrote:
> > Robert had interest in cross-compiling to other archs.  Robert, with the 
> > tests 
> > now in LTP, do you have any comments you'd like to add?
>
> Ah, OK found the thread, but I don't think in this case the autotools
> provides anything which cannot be done using plain Makefiles.
>
> It's just that pulling in the whole autotools mess (sorry, I've learned
> to hate autoconf & co) seemed to me rather heavyweight just for detecting
> 2 mutexes features.
>
> But maybe I'm missing something and we really need this after all.

Well, according to my experience as the maintainer of a 400+ packets
distribution build system, in general autotoolized packets just work in
cross scenarios, whereas almost anything else does not and makes endless
pain.

In this case, it should be adapted to the way the makefiles of the rest
of ltp work, so I agree that the autotoolization can be removed. I've
tested the latest ltp release yesterday night and (with some little
problems unrelated to the makefiles) cross building still works, so I've
no objections that you go ahead.

Robert
-- 
 Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
   Handelsregister:  Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
     Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
   Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |  Fax: +49-5121-206917-9


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to