On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 21:24 +0800, Roy Lee wrote: > Hi, > > I think you are right. Here's the fix for that patch. > > Roy
Thanks Roy, This has been applied. Regards-- Subrata > > > > > I think there is a problem with this patch. > > Since you call the wait_son_startup() function after the fork() and before > the > > test on the PID variable, the father AND the son will wait on the pipe, > leading > > to a dead-lock. > > > > I suggest to move the wait_son_startup() calls after the pid test. > > > > Regards. > > > > R. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. > Use priority code J8TL2D2. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone > _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
