On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 19:06 -0700, Henry Yei wrote:
> I sent the wrong version of the patch, this is the right version! Sorry
> about the spam.

Post Patch seems to work fine for me. Thanks. Patch applied.

Regards--
Subrata

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Henry Yei
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 5:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] sockioctl0 fix to stop relying on existing
> tty*
> 
> Previous patch didn't apply cleanly due some space conversion between my
> mail machine and test machine, this one should.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Henry Yei
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 3:55 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] sockioctl0 fix to stop relying on existing
> tty*
> 
> Sorry, there was a missing character in the patch. I've attached the
> updated patch. 
> 
> Post patch:
> <<<test_start>>>
> tag=sockioctl01 stime=1209163764
> cmdline="sockioctl01"
> contacts=""
> analysis=exit
> initiation_status="ok"
> <<<test_output>>>
> sockioctl01    1  PASS  :  bad file descriptor successful
> sockioctl01    2  PASS  :  not a socket successful
> sockioctl01    3  PASS  :  invalid option buffer successful
> sockioctl01    4  PASS  :  ATMARK on UDP successful
> sockioctl01    5  PASS  :  SIOCGIFCONF successful
> sockioctl01    6  PASS  :  SIOCGIFFLAGS successful
> sockioctl01    7  PASS  :  SIOCGIFFLAGS with invalid ifr successful
> sockioctl01    8  PASS  :  SIOCSIFFLAGS with invalid ifr successful
> incrementing stop
> <<<execution_status>>>
> duration=0 termination_type=exited termination_id=0 corefile=no cutime=0
> cstime=0 <<<test_end>>>
> 
> Prepatch:
> <<<test_start>>>
> tag=sockioctl01 stime=1193788811
> cmdline="sockioctl01"
> contacts=""
> analysis=exit
> initiation_status="ok"
> <<<test_output>>>
> sockioctl01    1  PASS  :  bad file descriptor successful
> sockioctl01    2  BROK  :  Could not open /dev/tty0 or /dev/tty - errno:
> No such device or address
> sockioctl01    3  BROK  :  Remaining cases broken
> sockioctl01    4  BROK  :  Remaining cases broken
> sockioctl01    5  BROK  :  Remaining cases broken
> sockioctl01    6  BROK  :  Remaining cases broken
> sockioctl01    7  BROK  :  Remaining cases broken
> sockioctl01    8  BROK  :  Remaining cases broken
> <<<execution_status>>>
> duration=0 termination_type=exited termination_id=2 corefile=no cutime=0
> cstime=0 <<<test_end>>>
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Subrata Modak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 12:20 PM
> To: Henry Yei
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] sockioctl0 fix to stop relying on existing
> tty*
> 
> On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 19:47 -0700, Henry Yei wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > This patch removes the dependency of existing tty* devices for this 
> > test to pass, and also ups the invalid file descriptor value from 400 
> > to 1025 which is used to confirm the EBADF errno.
> 
> But i get a testcase failure after applying the Patch. Please see below
> the results:
> 
> <<<test_start>>>
> tag=sockioctl01 stime=1209151071
> cmdline="sockioctl01"
> contacts=""
> analysis=exit
> initiation_status="ok"
> <<<test_output>>>
> incrementing stop
> sockioctl01    1  PASS  :  bad file descriptor successful
> sockioctl01    0  WARN  :  tst_rmdir(): TESTDIR was NULL; no removal
> attempted
> sockioctl01    2  FAIL  :  not a socket ; returned -1 (expected -1),
> errno 25 (expected 22)
> sockioctl01    3  PASS  :  invalid option buffer successful
> sockioctl01    4  PASS  :  ATMARK on UDP successful
> sockioctl01    5  PASS  :  SIOCGIFCONF successful
> sockioctl01    6  PASS  :  SIOCGIFFLAGS successful
> sockioctl01    7  PASS  :  SIOCGIFFLAGS with invalid ifr successful
> sockioctl01    8  PASS  :  SIOCSIFFLAGS with invalid ifr successful
> <<<execution_status>>>
> duration=0 termination_type=exited termination_id=5 corefile=no cutime=0
> cstime=0 <<<test_end>>>
> 
> $ uname -a
> Linux <sniff> 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5 #1 SMP Mon Feb 11 13:27:52 EST 2008
> i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
> 
> Test Executes fine pre-patch. It would be nice if you can share your
> test results pre and post-patch.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards--
> Subrata
> 
> > 
> > Henry Yei
> > MontaVista Software, Inc.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
> > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save
> $100.
> > Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
> > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com
> > /javaone _______________________________________________ Ltp-list 
> > mailing list [email protected] 
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
> 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to