On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 22:08 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:

> On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 19:57 +0530, Rishikesh K. Rajak wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 20:07 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: 
> > > On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 19:06 -0700, Henry Yei wrote:
> > > > I sent the wrong version of the patch, this is the right version! Sorry
> > > > about the spam.
> > > 
> > > Post Patch seems to work fine for me. Thanks. Patch applied.
> > 
> > Hi Subrata,
> > 
> > This testcase is still failing but it pass when we run with one
> > iteration. Below is the log file.
> 
> Thanks Rishi for pointing that out. Can you increase your loops and see
> the results.


I tested with multiple loops the result is same as failure.

Rishi

> 
> Henry,
> 
> Can you look into this ?
> 
> Renaud,
> 
> Is this something to do with concurrency stuff you have dealt with LTP
> test case(s)?
> 
> Regards--
> Subrata
> 
> > 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] sockioctl]# ./sockioctl01
> > sockioctl01    1  PASS  :  bad file descriptor successful
> > sockioctl01    2  PASS  :  not a socket successful
> > sockioctl01    3  PASS  :  invalid option buffer successful
> > sockioctl01    4  PASS  :  ATMARK on UDP successful
> > sockioctl01    5  PASS  :  SIOCGIFCONF successful
> > sockioctl01    6  PASS  :  SIOCGIFFLAGS successful
> > sockioctl01    7  PASS  :  SIOCGIFFLAGS with invalid ifr successful
> > sockioctl01    8  PASS  :  SIOCSIFFLAGS with invalid ifr successful
> > 
> > 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] sockioctl]# uname -a
> > Linux e326.in.ibm.com 2.6.18-90.el5 #1 SMP Tue Apr 15 18:05:09 EDT
> > 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
> > 
> > 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] sockioctl]# ./sockioctl01 -i 2
> > sockioctl01    1  PASS  :  bad file descriptor successful
> > sockioctl01    2  PASS  :  not a socket successful
> > sockioctl01    3  PASS  :  invalid option buffer successful
> > sockioctl01    4  PASS  :  ATMARK on UDP successful
> > sockioctl01    5  PASS  :  SIOCGIFCONF successful
> > sockioctl01    6  PASS  :  SIOCGIFFLAGS successful
> > sockioctl01    7  PASS  :  SIOCGIFFLAGS with invalid ifr successful
> > sockioctl01    8  PASS  :  SIOCSIFFLAGS with invalid ifr successful
> > sockioctl01    1  PASS  :  bad file descriptor successful
> > sockioctl01    2  FAIL  :  not a socket ; returned -1 (expected -1),
> > errno 9 (expected 22)
> > sockioctl01    3  PASS  :  invalid option buffer successful
> > sockioctl01    4  PASS  :  ATMARK on UDP successful
> > sockioctl01    5  PASS  :  SIOCGIFCONF successful
> > sockioctl01    6  PASS  :  SIOCGIFFLAGS successful
> > sockioctl01    7  PASS  :  SIOCGIFFLAGS with invalid ifr successful
> > sockioctl01    8  PASS  :  SIOCSIFFLAGS with invalid ifr successful
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Rishi
> > 
> > > 
> > > Regards--
> > > Subrata
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Henry Yei
> > > > Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 5:19 PM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > > Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] sockioctl0 fix to stop relying on existing
> > > > tty*
> > > > 
> > > > Previous patch didn't apply cleanly due some space conversion between my
> > > > mail machine and test machine, this one should.
> > > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Henry Yei
> > > > Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 3:55 PM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > > Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] sockioctl0 fix to stop relying on existing
> > > > tty*
> > > > 
> > > > Sorry, there was a missing character in the patch. I've attached the
> > > > updated patch. 
> > > > 
> > > > Post patch:
> > > > <<<test_start>>>
> > > > tag=sockioctl01 stime=1209163764
> > > > cmdline="sockioctl01"
> > > > contacts=""
> > > > analysis=exit
> > > > initiation_status="ok"
> > > > <<<test_output>>>
> > > > sockioctl01    1  PASS  :  bad file descriptor successful
> > > > sockioctl01    2  PASS  :  not a socket successful
> > > > sockioctl01    3  PASS  :  invalid option buffer successful
> > > > sockioctl01    4  PASS  :  ATMARK on UDP successful
> > > > sockioctl01    5  PASS  :  SIOCGIFCONF successful
> > > > sockioctl01    6  PASS  :  SIOCGIFFLAGS successful
> > > > sockioctl01    7  PASS  :  SIOCGIFFLAGS with invalid ifr successful
> > > > sockioctl01    8  PASS  :  SIOCSIFFLAGS with invalid ifr successful
> > > > incrementing stop
> > > > <<<execution_status>>>
> > > > duration=0 termination_type=exited termination_id=0 corefile=no cutime=0
> > > > cstime=0 <<<test_end>>>
> > > > 
> > > > Prepatch:
> > > > <<<test_start>>>
> > > > tag=sockioctl01 stime=1193788811
> > > > cmdline="sockioctl01"
> > > > contacts=""
> > > > analysis=exit
> > > > initiation_status="ok"
> > > > <<<test_output>>>
> > > > sockioctl01    1  PASS  :  bad file descriptor successful
> > > > sockioctl01    2  BROK  :  Could not open /dev/tty0 or /dev/tty - errno:
> > > > No such device or address
> > > > sockioctl01    3  BROK  :  Remaining cases broken
> > > > sockioctl01    4  BROK  :  Remaining cases broken
> > > > sockioctl01    5  BROK  :  Remaining cases broken
> > > > sockioctl01    6  BROK  :  Remaining cases broken
> > > > sockioctl01    7  BROK  :  Remaining cases broken
> > > > sockioctl01    8  BROK  :  Remaining cases broken
> > > > <<<execution_status>>>
> > > > duration=0 termination_type=exited termination_id=2 corefile=no cutime=0
> > > > cstime=0 <<<test_end>>>
> > > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Subrata Modak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 12:20 PM
> > > > To: Henry Yei
> > > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > > Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] sockioctl0 fix to stop relying on existing
> > > > tty*
> > > > 
> > > > On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 19:47 -0700, Henry Yei wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > > 
> > > > > This patch removes the dependency of existing tty* devices for this 
> > > > > test to pass, and also ups the invalid file descriptor value from 400 
> > > > > to 1025 which is used to confirm the EBADF errno.
> > > > 
> > > > But i get a testcase failure after applying the Patch. Please see below
> > > > the results:
> > > > 
> > > > <<<test_start>>>
> > > > tag=sockioctl01 stime=1209151071
> > > > cmdline="sockioctl01"
> > > > contacts=""
> > > > analysis=exit
> > > > initiation_status="ok"
> > > > <<<test_output>>>
> > > > incrementing stop
> > > > sockioctl01    1  PASS  :  bad file descriptor successful
> > > > sockioctl01    0  WARN  :  tst_rmdir(): TESTDIR was NULL; no removal
> > > > attempted
> > > > sockioctl01    2  FAIL  :  not a socket ; returned -1 (expected -1),
> > > > errno 25 (expected 22)
> > > > sockioctl01    3  PASS  :  invalid option buffer successful
> > > > sockioctl01    4  PASS  :  ATMARK on UDP successful
> > > > sockioctl01    5  PASS  :  SIOCGIFCONF successful
> > > > sockioctl01    6  PASS  :  SIOCGIFFLAGS successful
> > > > sockioctl01    7  PASS  :  SIOCGIFFLAGS with invalid ifr successful
> > > > sockioctl01    8  PASS  :  SIOCSIFFLAGS with invalid ifr successful
> > > > <<<execution_status>>>
> > > > duration=0 termination_type=exited termination_id=5 corefile=no cutime=0
> > > > cstime=0 <<<test_end>>>
> > > > 
> > > > $ uname -a
> > > > Linux <sniff> 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5 #1 SMP Mon Feb 11 13:27:52 EST 2008
> > > > i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
> > > > 
> > > > Test Executes fine pre-patch. It would be nice if you can share your
> > > > test results pre and post-patch.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Regards--
> > > > Subrata
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Henry Yei
> > > > > MontaVista Software, Inc.
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >  
> > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > --- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
> > > > > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save
> > > > $100.
> > > > > Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
> > > > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com
> > > > > /javaone _______________________________________________ Ltp-list 
> > > > > mailing list [email protected] 
> > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
> > > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
> > > Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
> > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Ltp-list mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
> Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
> Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to