On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 17:57 +0530, Rishikesh K. Rajak wrote: > On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 17:31 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I was thinking why not enable LTP to generate the OUTPUT and the LOG > > files as default. Let me know the pros and cons of this. I have created > > the attached patch for implementing the same: > > HI Subrata, > > Thanks for patch. But, just i was thinking it would be a better idea > to leave to the user, where and in which format he wants to create > result file. Just an idea.
Hi Rishi, Thanks for your comment. This patch (and the consequent enhancement) does not take away user freedom to generate his/her own away of creating output and log files. He/she can still use the options -l and -o to generate the same. What this patch provides is to create a output and log file only when the user has not mentioned them on ltp run. The idea of creating default output/log is from a user only, who felt that it is LTP´s drawback of not generating so. Regards-- Subrata > > - Rishi > > > > Signed-off-by: Subrata Modak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Regards-- > > Subrata > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
