On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 02:13 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On May 19, 2008, at 1:54 AM, Subrata Modak wrote: > > > On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 12:52 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > > > > On further offline discussion we found that the necessity for > > generation > > of a logfile may be mandatory as it´s size is not a constraint for > > most > > of the systems. I have applied this patch and hence future LTP will > > automatically generate a log file as default. > > > > Having said that, i would like to see patches which disables this > > (default logfile generation) in architectures where even logfile > > size is > > a constraint to save, given the nature of embedded hardware they have. > > > > Regards-- > > Subrata > > That, however, requires making some assumptions on the test set vs > typical output, architecture (64-bit, 32-bit, etc), FS cluster size, > and a host of other variables. It's just better to let the thing fail > 'naturally', if at all instead of over complicating things with some
I agree. Regards-- Subrata > detection scheme IMO. > -Garrett ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
