On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Subrata Modak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> I am afraid that this new version introduced more failures than the
> previous one. I have resorted to and merged the last stable patch given
> by you. I have additionally included run-io_cancel.sh to check for
> io_cancel01 binary availability on machines where it has not been built.
> If the tests are built it will run the tests, else will show the CONF
> message.
>
> Thanks for bearing with me multiple testing cycles. This is now merged.
> When you do porting in future you can look into this model as well.
>
> I will not be expecting more patches for the porting project.


I had a hangover when i types this. It should be:

* I will now be expecting more patches for the porting project.*

Regards--
Subrata


>
> Regards--
> Subrata
>
> On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 22:24 +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > Thank you for resending the patch. I have again tested across various
> > > architectures and kernels and had the following observation:
> > >
> > > 1) It encountered a build failure on a 2.6.7 kernel instead of presence
> > > of header checking. Please see whether you need to check for other
> > > parameters as well before building,
> >
> > I've intrduce the same technique used in
> > ltp/testcases/realtime/scripts/check_pi.sh. See attachment.
> >
> > > 2) When it installed successfully, it also ran successfully on those
> > > machines,
> > > 3) When it did not install as it did not build, the run will give
> errors
> > > due to absence of io_cancel* binary(s) in testcases/bin. User will see
> > > error message like:
> > >
> > > initiation_status="pan(): execvp of 'io_cancel01' (tag io_cancel01)
> > > failed.  errno:2  No such file or directory"
> > >
> > > Instead of that we should have some meaningful error message (the same
> i
> > > proposed to Li Zefan and Vijay Kumar) like:
> > >
> > > io_cancel01 0 CONF : System doesn't support execution of the test
> > >
> > > For this to happen, the runtest/syscalls should have the following code
> > > instead:
> > >
> > > io_cancel01 if [ -f io_cancel01 ]; then io_cancel; else echo
> > > "io_cancel01 0 CONF : System doesn't support execution of the test";
> > > exit 0; fi
> >
> >
> > Instead of editing runtest/syscalls, I've used #ifdef/#endif in
> > io_cancel01.c. See the attachment.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masatake YAMATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It's the best place to buy or sell services for
> just about anything Open Source.
> http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
>



-- 
Regards & Thanks--
Subrata
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to