On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 14:10 +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
> Could you merge one more patch?
Of course i will.
> 
> TEST_RETURN should not be inverted when logging.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masatake YAMATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tested and merged.

Regards--
Subrata
> 
> Index: testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_cancel/io_cancel01.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_cancel/io_cancel01.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.1
> diff -u -r1.1 io_cancel01.c
> --- testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_cancel/io_cancel01.c 26 Jun 2008 13:27:18 
> -0000      1.1
> +++ testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_cancel/io_cancel01.c 4 Jul 2008 05:09:11 
> -0000
> @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@
> 
>               if (TEST_RETURN == expected_return) {
>                       tst_resm(TPASS, "expected failure - "
> -                              "returned value = %d : %s", (-1 * TEST_RETURN),
> +                              "returned value = %d : %s", TEST_RETURN,
>                                strerror(-1 * TEST_RETURN));
>               } else {
>                       tst_resm(TFAIL, "unexpected returned value - %d - "


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to