On Monday 21 July 2008, Robin Getz wrote: > On Wed 16 Jul 2008 04:54, Paul E. McKenney pondered: > > So everyone wants LTP to fail one Linux distros that happen to make > > /bin/sh be a real Bourne shell? Sounds like this kind of defeats the > > purpose of testing... > > LTP assumes a POSIX compliant shell - not bash. > > If there are things in the build system (and I know there are) that assume > bash, and fail on a different shell, I think the preferred patches are ones > that make the script require only POSIX compliance - not changing the > /bin/sh location. > > If your shell is not POSIX - then the feeling has been that that is your > issue, and not everyone else should suffer for it.
except in this case it isnt a POSIX issue. the shell in use is broken. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
