On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Masatake YAMATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > > How about introducing TCID_DEFINE?
>> > > >
>> > > > I'm not sure puttint TCID_DEFINE macro to test.h.
>> > > > I'm not sure using a symbol as an argument for TCID_DEFINE macro
>> > > > is better than using a string. (I had strong lisp backgroud:-)
>> > > >
>> > > > If this acceptable, I'll update related documents and
>> > > > test cases I worked.
>> > >
>> > > I think, this is fine. You can work on other test cases you worked on
>> > > along similar lines. The patch is through.
>> >
>> > I've done on the other test cases.
>> > In addition, I've cleaned up Makefiles related to _64 and _16 testcases
>> > as suggested by Mike Frysinger.
>> >
>> I think was suggested by Garrett Cooper.
>
> Sorry, I'm wrong. As you wrote, It was suggested by
> Garrett Cooper.

      Thanks for making the changes Masatake-san. This'll make my life
a lot easier in terms of porting crackjack to the new makefile
infrastructure, and it's a lot easier / scalable than using cp / echo
to add your necessary defines to files :). Plus it lowers the
probability of cluttering up the LTP src repository by accident (^お^).
じゃあ、また後でね,
Garrett より

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to