Daniel Gollub wrote: > Fully agree on this. > Gilles, Darren, is there any objection to revert the "CFLAGS += -m64" line? > > Currently i have to patch this change out of the build environment to have a > proper build on i586. Since -m64 just gets appended on the user-defined CLFAGS > and there is no way to overwrite -m64 without touching the build environment. >
I don't mind reverting this patch. I the beginning, I just asked what would be the accepted solution. So I sent the patch I'm currently using to show what I missed but did not expect it to be applied without any discussion. This CFLAGS setting could be conditional (a script switch or whatever) or be env-exported before running any test. If I understood well, the latter is Garrett's opinion, isn't it? Gilles. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
