Subrata Modak wrote: > On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 09:45 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Historically tarballs haven't been made, nor has xfstests been packaged, >> but it's in cvs: http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-cmds/xfstests/ > > Hmmm. I went through the code in your CVS. I noticed that although the > SGI copyright is mentioned, but most of the code does not include the > GPL license definition. Like, you have only this now: > > #----------------------------------------------------------------------- > # Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Silicon Graphics, Inc. All Rights Reserved. > #----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Now, if include this code inside LTP, i will have things like this: > > #----------------------------------------------------------------------- > # Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Silicon Graphics, Inc. All Rights Reserved. > #----------------------------------------------------------------------- > /* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > */ > /* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by > */ > /* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or > */ > /* (at your option) any later version. > */ > /* > */ > /* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > */ > /* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > */ > /* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See > */ > /* the GNU General Public License for more details. > */ > /* > */ > /* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > */ > /* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software > */ > /* Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA > */ > > I was not able to find authors for all those code, expect few of the > following gentlemen: > [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], > > Now, if somebody amongst them, or anybody having written that code says that > he/she > does not have any problem this code being contributed to LTP by simply > Signing it > off like Signed-Off-By:[EMAIL PROTECTED], will be helpful. If you do not have > any > objection in me including that code in LTP (i will actually have that GPL > license > definition in every code), then you can just reply to this mail with a > Sign-off. > That will help. Well, any code I have contributed to the xfs test suite can certainly be included in the LTP, and for that: Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or, used to be: Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> But SGI (Mark?) can you guys go through and make sure the test suite is all explicitly, obviously GPL, if that's the intent? Thanks, -Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
