Eric Sandeen wrote: > Subrata Modak wrote: >> On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 09:45 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > >>> Historically tarballs haven't been made, nor has xfstests been packaged, >>> but it's in cvs: http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-cmds/xfstests/ >> Hmmm. I went through the code in your CVS. I noticed that although the >> SGI copyright is mentioned, but most of the code does not include the >> GPL license definition. Like, you have only this now: >> >> #----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> # Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Silicon Graphics, Inc. All Rights Reserved. >> #----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Now, if include this code inside LTP, i will have things like this: >> >> #----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> # Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Silicon Graphics, Inc. All Rights Reserved. >> #----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> /* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify >> */ >> /* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by >> */ >> /* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or >> */ >> /* (at your option) any later version. >> */ >> /* >> */ >> /* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, >> */ >> /* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of >> */ >> /* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See >> */ >> /* the GNU General Public License for more details. >> */ >> /* >> */ >> /* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License >> */ >> /* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software >> */ >> /* Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA >> */ >> >> I was not able to find authors for all those code, expect few of the >> following gentlemen: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED], >> [EMAIL PROTECTED], >> [EMAIL PROTECTED], >>
kenmcd (Ken McDonell - http://www.kenj.com.au/) is no longer at SGI. dxm (Daniel Moore) is no longer at SGI (came, went, came-back, went). lord (Steve Lord) is no longer at SGI (came, went, came-back, went :-). However, their xfstest contributions were all done while they worked for SGI. >> Now, if somebody amongst them, or anybody having written that code says that >> he/she >> does not have any problem this code being contributed to LTP by simply >> Signing it >> off like Signed-Off-By:[EMAIL PROTECTED], will be helpful. If you do not >> have any >> objection in me including that code in LTP (i will actually have that GPL >> license >> definition in every code), then you can just reply to this mail with a >> Sign-off. >> That will help. > Most of the tests have been written by people while working at SGI. I'll cc in Mark Goodwin to say what we should do here. > Well, any code I have contributed to the xfs test suite can certainly be > included in the LTP, and for that: > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > or, used to be: > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > But SGI (Mark?) can you guys go through and make sure the test suite is > all explicitly, obviously GPL, if that's the intent? > > Thanks, > > -Eric --Tim ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
