Hi Darren, On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 06:18:07PM +0000, Darren Hart wrote: > I can't speak for all of LTP but re. the realtime tests, thanks for > the input on the docs, I'll raise this with my team and try to get a > patch out to remedy that quickly.
Great, thanks! > As to the rdtsc bits, I'm not sure those tests need to remain in LTP > (anyone have strong feelings here?). We used them internally during > some debugging sessions and they carried over into the package > eventually incorporated into LTP. So I'd vote for removing them, until there is an in-LTP user. > You mentioned the "crapiness" of the Makefiles in LTP. The realtime > Makefiles have been overhauled a couple of times, other than the cruft > left over from the autotool-ectomy do you have any problems with the > current Makefiles? The LTP makefiles are not consistent at all, and they break over and over again over the months. It might be an idea to migrate them to kbuild. rsc -- Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
