Sebastien Dugue wrote:
>> However, if the xml output is from a system library and is a build
>> option (which defaults to off) it wouldn't effect the embedded folks or
>> the xml-haters :-)
>
> I'm not sure making it a compilation option would fit very well into
> the LTP infrastructure for those who run the whole testsuite as opposed to
> people focusing on specific tests (i.e. realtime) and are willing to
> hack on the Makefiles.
1) If they run the entire suite, they aren't embedded... right?
2) They wouldn't have to hack the Makefile, we can use pkgconfig
to enable it or not, automatically - although this might be a bit
harder now that we removed autotools, again... :-)
>
>> Still, I think post-processing makes the most sense
>> to me.
>
> Agreed.
Then the above is moot. :-)
>
> Sebastien.
>
>> -
>> Darren.
>>
>> --
>> Darren Hart
>> IBM Linux Technology Center
>> Real-Time Linux Team
>>
--
Darren Hart
IBM Linux Technology Center
Real-Time Linux Team
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
