On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:23:29 -0700 Darren Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Sebastien Dugue wrote:
> 
> >> However, if the xml output is from a system library and is a build 
> >> option (which defaults to off) it wouldn't effect the embedded folks or 
> >> the xml-haters :-)
> > 
> >   I'm not sure making it a compilation option would fit very well into
> > the LTP infrastructure for those who run the whole testsuite as opposed to
> > people focusing on specific tests (i.e. realtime) and are willing to
> > hack on the Makefiles.
> 
> 1) If they run the entire suite, they aren't embedded... right?

  Right, you make a point :)

> 2) They wouldn't have to hack the Makefile, we can use pkgconfig
>     to enable it or not, automatically - although this might be a bit
>     harder now that we removed autotools, again... :-)

  OK.

> 
> > 
> >>  Still, I think post-processing makes the most sense 
> >> to me.
> > 
> >   Agreed.
> 
> Then the above is moot. :-)

  Yep

> 
> > 
> >   Sebastien.
> > 
> >> -
> >> Darren.
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> Darren Hart
> >> IBM Linux Technology Center
> >> Real-Time Linux Team
> >>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Darren Hart
> IBM Linux Technology Center
> Real-Time Linux Team
> 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to