On Thursday 02 July 2009 21:21:06 Garrett Cooper wrote: > Both sinclude and include are possible I suppose, but as far as I > understand that actually does an fstat, tries to open the file, etc, > but this completely ignores the include statement and reduces I/O a bit.
yes, it'll remove a syscall or two, but i dont think that is significant in the larger scheme of things the problem is that i dont want these kind of ifdef things propagating as they'll get tweaked and go inconsistent all over the place how about include a top level .mk file that always exists and in there, you have the conditional config.mk include -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
