On Jul 22, 2009, at 11:32 AM, srikanth krishnakar wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Kumar Gala > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jul 22, 2009, at 10:38 AM, srikanth krishnakar wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Kumar Gala > <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not seeing any BUG* in traps.c @ line 904. > > > On Jul 21, 2009, at 4:33 AM, srikanth krishnakar wrote: > > The LTP test case msgctl10.c fails on linux-2.6.29.6 for PowerPC > architecture (ppc440) > > > msgctl10 1 B------------[ cut here ]------------ > kernel BUG at arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c:904! > Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#9] > > I'm not seeing any BUG* in traps.c @ line 904. Do you have some > other patches on top of 2.6.29.6? > > - k > > > I have LTTng patches on top of linux-2.6.29.6. > > Does it modify traps.c? Can you see what the code around line 904 > looks like and post that. > > - k > 896 > 897 #if defined(CONFIG_XILINX_VIRTEX_5_FXT) && > defined(CONFIG_PPC_FPU) > 898 if (reason & REASON_ILLEGAL) { > 899 if (excep_state < 1) { > 900 excep_state++; > 901 return; > 902 } > 903 /* should never get here */ > 904 BUG(); > 905 } > 906 #endif > 907 > 908 /* Try to emulate it if we should. */ >
Are you sure this is coming from the LTTng patches? Which actual patch makes this change? - k ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
