Has this Patch been tested on the concerned Power Box ? I would need some info before applying this.
Regards-- Subrata On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 18:38 +0530, srikanth krishnakar wrote: > Hi all, > > > I always found the remap_file_pages failing in PowerPC target > (ppc44x) , the patch to fix the test cases of remap_file_pages passes > the test cases on PowerPC targets ( ppc44x virtex target does not use > bootloader ), any better suggestions are welcome. > > -Srikanth > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:01 AM, srikanth krishnakar > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Kumar Gala > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jul 22, 2009, at 11:32 AM, srikanth krishnakar > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Kumar Gala > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jul 22, 2009, at 10:38 AM, srikanth > krishnakar wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Kumar Gala > <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not seeing any BUG* in traps.c @ line 904. > > > On Jul 21, 2009, at 4:33 AM, srikanth > krishnakar wrote: > > The LTP test case msgctl10.c fails on > linux-2.6.29.6 for PowerPC architecture > (ppc440) > > > msgctl10 1 B------------[ cut > here ]------------ > kernel BUG at arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c:904! > Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#9] > > I'm not seeing any BUG* in traps.c @ line > 904. Do you have some other patches on top of > 2.6.29.6? > > - k > > > I have LTTng patches on top of linux-2.6.29.6. > > Does it modify traps.c? Can you see what the > code around line 904 looks like and post that. > > - k > 896 > 897 #if defined(CONFIG_XILINX_VIRTEX_5_FXT) > && defined(CONFIG_PPC_FPU) > 898 if (reason & REASON_ILLEGAL) { > 899 if (excep_state < 1) { > 900 excep_state++; > 901 return; > 902 } > 903 /* should never get here > */ > 904 BUG(); > 905 } > 906 #endif > 907 > 908 /* Try to emulate it if we > should. */ > > > > Are you sure this is coming from the LTTng patches? > Which actual patch makes this change? > > - k > Thanks kumar, > > > > I've got the patch out which fixes the issues. But now.. seems > there is some generic issue in PPC440 targets, I am observing > that > remap_file_pages01 and remap_file_pages02 test cases from LTP > are failing since Linux-2.6.24 kernel to Linux-2.6.30. If you > can give some pointers that would be greatly appreciated ! Or > if you have results for this on any PPC44x would be helpful. > > > Arch : PowerPC > > Target : Xilinx PowerPC440 virtex5 > > > > I've tried to test the cause for this but found that kernel > throws error message of "segmentation fault". > > > > Thanks in Advance. > > > > -Srikant > > > > > > > > -- > "The Good You Do, The Best You GET" > > Regards > Srikanth Krishnakar > ********************** > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
