On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Garrett Cooper <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:29 AM, srikanth
> krishnakar<[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Subrata Modak <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 20:56 +0530, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
> >> > I see these two test cases are failing on PowerPC target (ppc440) as
> >> > shown in output file, but they are listed as PASS in log file of the
> >> > LTP :
> >> >
> >> > Target : PowerPC (ppc440)
> >> > Kernel: Linux-2.6.29
> >> > LTP Version : ltp-full-20090731
> >> >
> >> > LTP output file :
> >> > #############
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 1. add_key01
> >> > --------------------
> >> >
> >> > <<<test_start>>>
> >> > tag=add_key01 stime=1248549741
> >> > cmdline="add_key01"
> >> > contacts=""
> >> > analysis=exit
> >> > <<<test_output>>>
> >> > add_key01 1 TFAIL : add_key01 failed - errno = 38 : Function not
> >> > implemented
> >> > <<<execution_status>>>
> >> > initiation_status="ok"
> >> > duration=0 termination_type=exited termination_id=0 corefile=no
> >> > cutime=0 cstime=0
> >> > <<<test_end>>>
> >> >
> >> > 2. add_key02
> >> > ----------------------
> >> >
> >> > <<<test_start>>>
> >> > tag=add_key02 stime=1248549741
> >> > cmdline="add_key02"
> >> > contacts=""
> >> > analysis=exit
> >> > <<<test_output>>>
> >> > add_key02 0 TINFO : call add_key() with wrong args got
> >> > UNEXPECTED errno:38
> >> > add_key02 1 TFAIL : add_key02 failed - errno = 38 : Function not
> >> > implemented
> >> > <<<execution_status>>>
> >> > initiation_status="ok"
> >> > duration=0 termination_type=exited termination_id=0 corefile=no
> >> > cutime=0 cstime=1
> >> > <<<test_end>>>
> >> >
> >> > --------------------------------------------------------
> >> >
> >> > BUT the Log file shows as PASS to the above test cases :
> >> >
> >> > ###########################
> >> >
> >> > add_key01 PASS 0
> >> > add_key02 PASS 0
> >> >
> >> > ###########################
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > May anyone explain, why it is so ? Is it a known behaviour ?
> >>
> >> No. It is not. On my X_32, it passes fine.
> >
> > Is it PowePC target on which you have tested ?
> >>
> >>
> >> $ ./testcases/bin/add_key01
> >> add_key01 1 TPASS : add_key call succeeded
> >> $ echo $?
> >> 0
> >> $ ./testcases/bin/add_key02
> >> add_key02 0 TINFO : call add_key() with wrong args got EXPECTED
> >> errno:22
> >> add_key02 1 TPASS : add_key call succeeded
> >> $ echo $?
> >> 0
> >> $ uname -a
> >> Linux 2.6.18-92.el5 #1 SMP Tue Apr 29 13:16:12 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386
> >> GNU/Linux
>
> Hi Srikanth,
> I think that the error is fairly intuitive (function not
> implemented). Are you sure that your subarchitecture supports
> add_key(2)?
> Hi Subrata,
> As far as the actual issue is concerned, I think that the problem
> is that someone's exiting with exit(0) instead of tst_exit()...
> Thanks,
> -Garrett
>
Thanks Garrett,
I will look into it.
--
"The Good You Do, The Best You GET"
Regards
Srikanth Krishnakar
**********************
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
