Hi all,
I observed that these two test cases are known to be failing on following
architectures :
1. *PowerPC* (ppc440) > Kernel *Linux-2.6.29.6*
2. *MIPS* > Kernel *Linux-2.6.28.10*
<<<test_start>>>
tag=*add_key01* stime=1249655730
cmdline="add_key01"
contacts=""
analysis=exit
<<<test_output>>>
add_key01 1 TFAIL : add_key01 failed - errno = 38 : *Function not
implemented*
<<<execution_status>>>
initiation_status="ok"
duration=0 termination_type=exited termination_id=0 corefile=no
cutime=1 cstime=0
<<<test_end>>>
<<<test_start>>>
tag=*add_key02* stime=1249655730
cmdline="add_key02"
contacts=""
analysis=exit
<<<test_output>>>
add_key02 0 TINFO : call add_key() with wrong args got UNEXPECTED
errno:38
add_key02 1 TFAIL : add_key02 failed - errno = 38 :* Function not
implemented*
<<<execution_status>>>
initiation_status="ok"
duration=1 termination_type=exited termination_id=0 corefile=no
cutime=0 cstime=2
<<<test_end>>>
Are these two test cases intended for these architectures ? Have you tested
these tests on any of above mentioned architectures ?
Waiting for your comments ?
-Srikanth
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:54 PM, srikanth krishnakar
<[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Garrett Cooper <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:29 AM, srikanth
>> krishnakar<[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Subrata Modak <
>> [email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 20:56 +0530, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
>> >> > I see these two test cases are failing on PowerPC target (ppc440) as
>> >> > shown in output file, but they are listed as PASS in log file of the
>> >> > LTP :
>> >> >
>> >> > Target : PowerPC (ppc440)
>> >> > Kernel: Linux-2.6.29
>> >> > LTP Version : ltp-full-20090731
>> >> >
>> >> > LTP output file :
>> >> > #############
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > 1. add_key01
>> >> > --------------------
>> >> >
>> >> > <<<test_start>>>
>> >> > tag=add_key01 stime=1248549741
>> >> > cmdline="add_key01"
>> >> > contacts=""
>> >> > analysis=exit
>> >> > <<<test_output>>>
>> >> > add_key01 1 TFAIL : add_key01 failed - errno = 38 : Function
>> not
>> >> > implemented
>> >> > <<<execution_status>>>
>> >> > initiation_status="ok"
>> >> > duration=0 termination_type=exited termination_id=0 corefile=no
>> >> > cutime=0 cstime=0
>> >> > <<<test_end>>>
>> >> >
>> >> > 2. add_key02
>> >> > ----------------------
>> >> >
>> >> > <<<test_start>>>
>> >> > tag=add_key02 stime=1248549741
>> >> > cmdline="add_key02"
>> >> > contacts=""
>> >> > analysis=exit
>> >> > <<<test_output>>>
>> >> > add_key02 0 TINFO : call add_key() with wrong args got
>> >> > UNEXPECTED errno:38
>> >> > add_key02 1 TFAIL : add_key02 failed - errno = 38 : Function
>> not
>> >> > implemented
>> >> > <<<execution_status>>>
>> >> > initiation_status="ok"
>> >> > duration=0 termination_type=exited termination_id=0 corefile=no
>> >> > cutime=0 cstime=1
>> >> > <<<test_end>>>
>> >> >
>> >> > --------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >
>> >> > BUT the Log file shows as PASS to the above test cases :
>> >> >
>> >> > ###########################
>> >> >
>> >> > add_key01 PASS 0
>> >> > add_key02 PASS 0
>> >> >
>> >> > ###########################
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > May anyone explain, why it is so ? Is it a known behaviour ?
>> >>
>> >> No. It is not. On my X_32, it passes fine.
>> >
>> > Is it PowePC target on which you have tested ?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> $ ./testcases/bin/add_key01
>> >> add_key01 1 TPASS : add_key call succeeded
>> >> $ echo $?
>> >> 0
>> >> $ ./testcases/bin/add_key02
>> >> add_key02 0 TINFO : call add_key() with wrong args got EXPECTED
>> >> errno:22
>> >> add_key02 1 TPASS : add_key call succeeded
>> >> $ echo $?
>> >> 0
>> >> $ uname -a
>> >> Linux 2.6.18-92.el5 #1 SMP Tue Apr 29 13:16:12 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386
>> >> GNU/Linux
>>
>> Hi Srikanth,
>> I think that the error is fairly intuitive (function not
>> implemented). Are you sure that your subarchitecture supports
>> add_key(2)?
>> Hi Subrata,
>> As far as the actual issue is concerned, I think that the problem
>> is that someone's exiting with exit(0) instead of tst_exit()...
>> Thanks,
>> -Garrett
>>
>
> Thanks Garrett,
>
> I will look into it.
>
>
> --
> "The Good You Do, The Best You GET"
>
> Regards
> Srikanth Krishnakar
> **********************
>
--
"The Good You Do, The Best You GET"
Regards
Srikanth Krishnakar
**********************
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
