On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Mike Frysinger<[email protected]> wrote: > On Sunday 19 July 2009 00:38:39 Garrett Cooper wrote: >> int errnochoose(void){ //choose the relative errno >> >> switch (TEST_ERRNO){ >> - case 0: tst_exit(); >> - case ECHILD: strerror((int)"ECHILD"); >> - break; >> - case EINTR: strerror((int)"EINTR"); >> - break; >> - case EINVAL: strerror((int)"EINVAL"); >> - break; >> - default: strerror((int)"Other Error"); >> + case 0: tst_exit(); >> + break; >> + default: strerror(TEST_ERRNO); >> break; >> } > > maybe i'm missing something, but strerror() doesnt write any output, it > returns a string. so ignoring the return value of strerror() makes it > pointless. which means this whole function is useless ? > -mike
Yes, you're absolutely correct now that I think about it. perror(3) would be a whole different beast... Thanks, -Garrett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
