On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Mike Frysinger<[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday 04 August 2009 04:48:25 Michal Simek wrote: >> I am thinking that will be good to extend return flag for function not >> implemented (errno 38) because >> some of tests return it when you don't have enable that option is kernel >> config. >> What do you think? > > what "return flag" are you talking about ? do you mean test status like > TINFO/TBROK/etc... ?
I was wondering about this earlier -- why wouldn't TCONF be sufficient? Thanks, -Garrett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
