On Thursday 13 August 2009 05:04:13 Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Mike Frysinger<[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 04 August 2009 04:48:25 Michal Simek wrote: > >> I am thinking that will be good to extend return flag for function not > >> implemented (errno 38) because > >> some of tests return it when you don't have enable that option is kernel > >> config. > >> What do you think? > > > > what "return flag" are you talking about ? do you mean test status like > > TINFO/TBROK/etc... ? > > I was wondering about this earlier -- why wouldn't TCONF be sufficient?
should be fine i think ... we just have to (1) pick a method (2) document it and (3) start using it -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
