On Thursday 30 July 2009 05:57:54 Jiri Palecek wrote: > the commit "extend the test result to a bit field so we can extend the > output further" from July 20th unfortunately changes the code, that was > previously a bitfield, to a non-bitfield. This causes FAILED tests to > return erroneously 0. > > This patch changes the test result codes to be individual bits in the > bitfield (effectively reverting a small part of aforementioned patch).
what tests exactly are failing ? where/why is this causing a problem ? i cant imagine a bit field being used for these values to really be necessary considering their values are mutually exclusive. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
