On Monday 24 August 2009 04:44:05 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Saturday 22 August 2009 22:37:28 CAI Qian wrote: > > > ENOSYS is the expected result if the kernel under test has no such > > > implementation, so I would consider TPASS or TCONF. > > > > TPASS is wrong. in another thread, people seemed to be OK with TCONF. > > Still, the summary only shows `FAIL' or `PASS'. What is it supposed to > show for TCONF?
i think acct01 handles this OK:
if (errno == ENOSYS) {
tst_resm(TCONF,
"BSD process accounting is not configured in this kernel.");
tst_resm(TCONF, "Test will not run.");
tst_exit();
although we could perhaps codify this nicely by adding a new
tst_missing_support() or similar function that would do this kind of thing.
first argument would be an explanatory message like "BSD process accounting is
not configured in this kernel". any suggestions for a better function name ?
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
