On Tuesday 05 January 2010 22:26:44 Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Jiri Palecek ([email protected]): > > Michal, I suspect the failures you see are somehow related to > > alignment (that your architecture doesn't like odd addresses). Is > > that right? Under x86, the address gets aligned (so some of the > > space is unused). > > > > Perhaps both of these behaviors should be tested by LTP? > > Gah, yes, Nathan had mentioned arches where this matters (including > some power?). Nathan, did you have a generic fix for this in > userspace? Should always be safe to do > (stack + stack_size - 1) & ~0xf > ?
(sizeof(long double)-1) would probably be better than 0xf -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
