On Mar 2, 2010, at 6:46 AM, Rishikesh K Rajak <[email protected] 
 > wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 04:28:25PM +0800, Shi Weihua wrote:
>>>> There's a lot of noise in the patch because of if-else behavior in
>>>> trying to determine the mail app. That's why I didn't commit this  
>>>> (it
>>>> requires verification of previous mail applications as well).
>>>
>>> Thanks Garret, Still i have not committed this to CVS repo.
>>>
>>> Shi, can you please verify if this patch does not break with any  
>>> other
>>> mail application.
>>
>>  In fact, i don't know any other mail application.
>>  When i tested RHEL's alpha version, this ltp bug catched. so tried  
>> to fix it.
>>
>>  Maybe, you should knock FOSS community(?).
> Hi Shi,
>
> With Feb release still i am seeing some failure with mail file.
>
> cmdline="export TCdat=$LTPROOT/testcases/bin; mail_tests.sh"
> contacts=""
> analysis=exit
> <<<test_output>>>
> mail_tests::setup    0  TINFO  :  INIT: Removing all mails for  
> mail_test
> and root
> mail_tests::mail01    0  TINFO  :  Test #1: mail r...@localhost will
> send mail to root
> mail_tests::mail01    0  TINFO  :  Test #1: user on local machine.
> mail_tests::mail01    1  TPASS  :  Test #1: Mail was sent to root &  
> was
> received
> mail_tests::mail02    0  TINFO  :  Test #2: mail u...@bad-domain will
> result in failure
> mail_tests::mail02    0  TINFO  :  Test #2: to deliver the mail.  
> Mailer
> daemon should
> mail_tests::mail02    0  TINFO  :  Test #2: report this failure.
> mail_tests::mail02    2  TFAIL  :  Test #2: No new mail for root.
> Reason:
> No mail for root
> mail_tests::mail03    0  TINFO  :  Test #3: mail
> non_existent_u...@localhost will fail
> mail_tests::mail03    0  TINFO  :  Test #3: to deliver the mail.  
> Mailer
> daemon should
> mail_tests::mail03    0  TINFO  :  Test #3: report this failure.
> mail_tests::mail03    3  TFAIL  :  Test #3: No new mail for root.
> Reason:
> No mail for root
> mail_tests::mail04    0  TINFO  :  Test #4: Test that mail -c
> u...@domain will
> mail_tests::mail04    0  TINFO  :  Test #4: carbon copy u...@domain
> mail_tests::mail04    4  TPASS  :  Test #4: Mail was carbon copied to
> user mail_test
> mail_tests::mail05    0  TINFO  :  Test #5: Test that mail -b
> u...@domain will
> mail_tests::mail05    0  TINFO  :  Test #5: blind carbon copy
> u...@domain
> mail_tests::mail05    5  TPASS  :  Test #5: Mail was carbon copied to
> user mail_test
> mail_tests::cleanup    0  TINFO  :  Test CLEAN: Removing temporary  
> files
> from /tmp
> mail_tests::cleanup    0  TINFO  :  Test CLEAN: Removing temporary  
> user
> mail_test
> <<<execution_status>>>
>
> Can you please look into it if possible? I have run this testcase on
> SLES10.SP3GA & RHEL5.4 GA on x86_64 , ppc64 & s390x and everywhere  
> same
> result.

Same here on Gentoo Linux before and after my cleanup to the test.

Thanks,
-Garrett

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to