at 2010-3-3 0:19, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mar 2, 2010, at 6:46 AM, Rishikesh K Rajak
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 04:28:25PM +0800, Shi Weihua wrote:
>>>>> There's a lot of noise in the patch because of if-else behavior in
>>>>> trying to determine the mail app. That's why I didn't commit this (it
>>>>> requires verification of previous mail applications as well).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Garret, Still i have not committed this to CVS repo.
>>>>
>>>> Shi, can you please verify if this patch does not break with any other
>>>> mail application.
>>>
>>> In fact, i don't know any other mail application.
>>> When i tested RHEL's alpha version, this ltp bug catched. so tried
>>> to fix it.
>>>
>>> Maybe, you should knock FOSS community(?).
>> Hi Shi,
>>
>> With Feb release still i am seeing some failure with mail file.
>>
>> cmdline="export TCdat=$LTPROOT/testcases/bin; mail_tests.sh"
>> contacts=""
>> analysis=exit
>> <<<test_output>>>
>> mail_tests::setup 0 TINFO : INIT: Removing all mails for mail_test
>> and root
>> mail_tests::mail01 0 TINFO : Test #1: mail r...@localhost will
>> send mail to root
>> mail_tests::mail01 0 TINFO : Test #1: user on local machine.
>> mail_tests::mail01 1 TPASS : Test #1: Mail was sent to root & was
>> received
>> mail_tests::mail02 0 TINFO : Test #2: mail u...@bad-domain will
>> result in failure
>> mail_tests::mail02 0 TINFO : Test #2: to deliver the mail. Mailer
>> daemon should
>> mail_tests::mail02 0 TINFO : Test #2: report this failure.
>> mail_tests::mail02 2 TFAIL : Test #2: No new mail for root.
>> Reason:
>> No mail for root
>> mail_tests::mail03 0 TINFO : Test #3: mail
>> non_existent_u...@localhost will fail
>> mail_tests::mail03 0 TINFO : Test #3: to deliver the mail. Mailer
>> daemon should
>> mail_tests::mail03 0 TINFO : Test #3: report this failure.
>> mail_tests::mail03 3 TFAIL : Test #3: No new mail for root.
>> Reason:
>> No mail for root
>> mail_tests::mail04 0 TINFO : Test #4: Test that mail -c
>> u...@domain will
>> mail_tests::mail04 0 TINFO : Test #4: carbon copy u...@domain
>> mail_tests::mail04 4 TPASS : Test #4: Mail was carbon copied to
>> user mail_test
>> mail_tests::mail05 0 TINFO : Test #5: Test that mail -b
>> u...@domain will
>> mail_tests::mail05 0 TINFO : Test #5: blind carbon copy
>> u...@domain
>> mail_tests::mail05 5 TPASS : Test #5: Mail was carbon copied to
>> user mail_test
>> mail_tests::cleanup 0 TINFO : Test CLEAN: Removing temporary files
>> from /tmp
>> mail_tests::cleanup 0 TINFO : Test CLEAN: Removing temporary user
>> mail_test
>> <<<execution_status>>>
>>
>> Can you please look into it if possible? I have run this testcase on
>> SLES10.SP3GA & RHEL5.4 GA on x86_64 , ppc64 & s390x and everywhere same
>> result.
>
> Same here on Gentoo Linux before and after my cleanup to the test.
This fail message is same as my message which outputed on RHEL6alpha3 at
2009.12.
>> mail_tests::mail03 3 TFAIL : Test #3: No new mail for root.
>> Reason:
>> No mail for root
The mailx version on your system is "Heirloom Mail" ? you can get the version
by a
command of echo "d" | mail -u root.
If it's "Heirloom Mail", you should accept my patch.
http://marc.info/?l=ltp-list&m=126440546415559&w=2
If it's other mailx, please give me the output of echo "d" | mail -u root, let's
try to fix it.
-Shi Weihua
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
