On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 14:53 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Stephen Smalley ([email protected]): > > On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 22:36 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > > > On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 10:52 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 17:43 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > > > > > Hi Serge, > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 14:52 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > > > > Just a little note to announce that the selinux testsuite is now up > > > > > > as a > > > > > > git tree at kernel.org. You can fetch it using > > > > > > > > > > > > git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/tests/selinux-testsuite > > > > > > > > > > Great. So, how far does it differ from that we have in LTP ? > > > > > http://ltp.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=ltp/ltp-dev.git;a=tree;f=testcases/kernel/security/selinux-testsuite;h=066df4cdf2f8a80a0045e338b4bb2bf0f5d37091;hb=HEAD > > > > > > > > > > As you, Stephen and others in SELinux <[email protected]> were the > > > > > main contributors to the SELinux test(s) in LTP, i guess the > > > > > next/future > > > > > development for SELinux tests will be happening in the new tree. > > > > > > > > > > So, i would rather keep pulling to LTP from your tree. Now, could you > > > > > please let me know: > > > > > > > > > > 1. Whether the new tree contains all scenarios which is present > > > > > in > > > > > LTP. In such a case a complete pruning of LTP SELinux tests > > > > > can > > > > > be done and replaced with your tree contents, > > > > > 2. If some of the LTP tests are not there, then i would like to > > > > > retain them in LTP side-by-side your tree contents, > > > > > > > > The new tree contains all of the selinux tests present in the LTP. You > > > > cannot however simply replace the ltp version of the tests with this > > > > tree, as this tree is a standalone testsuite and will not run within the > > > > ltp test harness. This testsuite is based on the original standalone > > > > selinux testsuite that was contributed by us to IBM to port to the LTP. > > > > We have internally maintained this testsuite in parallel to the ltp > > > > version as we have found it easier to set up, use, debug, and maintain. > > > > > > Thanks Stephen. Since you have maintained the Original-One Internally > > > and have simultaneously contributed changes to the LTP-version of > > > SELinux, i am depending on you/Serge/SELinux-Mailing-List-members to > > > keep sending patches to LTP to update the LTP-version at regular > > > intervals (off-course at your convenience ;-)) > > > > I think that will depend on whether there is some benefit to maintaining > > the ltp version. We might derive some benefit if the ltp selinux > > testsuite were better integrated (e.g. tests run by default if SELinux > > is enabled on the host) and if the tests got some regular attention from > > the ltp maintainers. Otherwise, it may be better to just remove the > > tests from the ltp and point people to the standalone version. > > I don't object to the tests being maintained in LTP. But so far, AFAICS, > the cost of maintaining in LTP far outweighs the benefits. > > So I'd like to know, does anyone (IBM?) *use* the version in LTP for > automated testing?
Yes, there are teams which still use LTP SELinux on Enterprise Distro testing. Regards-- Subrata > > If not, heck we could replace ltp/testcases/kernel/security/selinux/* > with a script that git clones the testsuite and runs it. > > Mind you it's not the selinux tests per se - it's the random bulk LTP > updates which then break selinux tests, or worse, the autoconf cruft > to try to detect whether the user wants selinux tests - which constitute > the real maintenance cost. > > If someone who uses the LTP selinux tests could step up and offer > to periodically run the tests and work with (me and) the community > to push fixes, I'll be happy to help out. > > -serge > > -- > This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. > If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to [email protected] with > the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
