Can both of you agree to send a single patch ? Regards-- Subrata
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 22:19 +0530, gowrishankar wrote: > On Monday 06 September 2010 09:46 PM, Subrata Modak wrote: > > Darren/Gowri, > > > > Are you aware of this patch ? Can you please provide your comments ? > > > > > Subrata/Cyril, > Apologies that I tagged this mail, but somehow forgot to reply > immediately. > > I had already prepared a patch (before Cyril shared his part) to make > atomic_add much more maintenance free and sharing with you guys now. > Please find it attached. > > Thanks, > Gowrishankar > > > Regards-- > > Subrata > > > > On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 16:47 +0200, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > > > >> Hi! > >> The atomic_add() assembler for x86 is missing hint for gcc that value of > >> v->counter is being modified by xaddl instruction and as this variable > >> is changed only from this asm runtime, some combination of gcc > >> optimalizations allows for this value to be placed in binary .rodata > >> section resulting in realtime tests segfaulting when trying to do > >> atomic_add(). It's reproducible on SLES11 (gcc 4.3.2) with -O2. > >> > >> Patch attached. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis [email protected] > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > >> > >> Show off your parallel programming skills. > >> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > >> _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list > >> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
