On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:18 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Shubham Goyal <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes Iranna I agree with you and I also feel that "pounder21" tree should > > not be removed from LTP. As you correctly said currently its difficult to > > run LTP's pounder on stand alone systems due to some other helper files > > dependency. I will try to address this problem ASAP and try to make pounder > > run on stand alone systems without any other dependencies. I have it in my > > TODO list. > > Should it be moved to a separate module under LTP CVS?
I would prefer to keep it in git for the time being. Let it be where it is. We will not try to integrate it inside LTP root Makefile, so, configure/make/make install will not interfere with pounder21 directory. Once Subham comes wiht the patch for generic build/install we can integrate it to LTP Makefile then. Since, the IBM distro test teams use both LTP and Pounder21, it would be much easier for them to access them from a single tarball :-) Regards-- Subrata > Thanks, > -Garrett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Centralized Desktop Delivery: Dell and VMware Reference Architecture Simplifying enterprise desktop deployment and management using Dell EqualLogic storage and VMware View: A highly scalable, end-to-end client virtualization framework. Read more! http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-eql-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
