Hi Garrett,
Our intention is that pounder21 tree should always be a
part of coming LTP tarball releases in the same directory where it is
sitting now. We have plans to use latest LTP for coming new distros and in
that case we will need pounder21 along with LTP.
So if you move pounder21 directory to a separate module under LTP CVS, will
it still fulfil our above requirement?
Thanks,
-Shubham
Garrett Cooper
<[email protected]
om> To
Shubham Goyal/India/i...@ibmin
11/11/2010 10:48 cc
PM Iranna D Ankad/India/i...@ibmin, LTP
list
<[email protected]>,
Murlin Wenzel <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
takahash <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: [LTP] [RFC] Remove
testcases/pounder21
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Shubham Goyal <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes Iranna I agree with you and I also feel that "pounder21" tree should
> not be removed from LTP. As you correctly said currently its difficult to
> run LTP's pounder on stand alone systems due to some other helper files
> dependency. I will try to address this problem ASAP and try to make
pounder
> run on stand alone systems without any other dependencies. I have it in
my
> TODO list.
Should it be moved to a separate module under LTP CVS?
Thanks,
-Garrett
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Centralized Desktop Delivery: Dell and VMware Reference Architecture
Simplifying enterprise desktop deployment and management using
Dell EqualLogic storage and VMware View: A highly scalable, end-to-end
client virtualization framework. Read more!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-eql-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
