I just cloned the LTP git repo from SF and ran the suite. Strangely, the report showed the LTP version to be an old one. Is something amiss?
$ git log -1 commit 61ac0eaf2a3f24378ed0ab20a1613134ab83843a Author: Cyril Hrubis <[email protected]> Date: Wed May 11 17:08:32 2011 +0200 Add newline to include/cleanup.c to stop GCC from whining. Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <[email protected]> $ head ChangeLog LTP-20100831 commit dd59d49d75598d163f1b4599067a9f0dcb70e6c4 Author: Garrett Cooper <[email protected]> Date: Tue Aug 31 23:09:49 2010 -0700 The cacheflush system call does not return EINVAL in the latest Linux kernel. see the link: A related patch about the cacheflush function: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/9/203 Thanks, Sandip ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran developers boost performance applications - including clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
