On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Sandip Bhattacharya <[email protected]> wrote: > I just cloned the LTP git repo from SF and ran the suite. Strangely, the > report > showed the LTP version to be an old one. Is something amiss? > > > $ git log -1 > commit 61ac0eaf2a3f24378ed0ab20a1613134ab83843a > Author: Cyril Hrubis <[email protected]> > Date: Wed May 11 17:08:32 2011 +0200 > > Add newline to include/cleanup.c to stop GCC from whining. > > Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <[email protected]> > > > $ head ChangeLog > LTP-20100831 > > commit dd59d49d75598d163f1b4599067a9f0dcb70e6c4 > Author: Garrett Cooper <[email protected]> > Date: Tue Aug 31 23:09:49 2010 -0700 > > The cacheflush system call does not return EINVAL in the latest Linux > kernel. see the link: > A related patch about the cacheflush function: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/9/203
Updating the ChangeLog is a manual procedure (shouldn't be, but it is). -Garrett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran developers boost performance applications - including clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
