On 11/14/2013 12:02 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Hi! >> Here treat every feature as a signle test program. >> >> Makefile: add configure for ffsb >> >> runtest/fs_ext4: 5 new features test currently enabled >> >> run_ext4_test.sh: According to the input parameter to decide which >> feature test to be called. >> >> Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]> >> --- >> runtest/fs_ext4 | 6 +- >> testcases/kernel/fs/Makefile | 2 +- >> testcases/kernel/fs/ext4-new-features/Makefile | 1 + >> .../kernel/fs/ext4-new-features/run_ext4_test.sh | 115 >> ++++++--------------- >> 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/runtest/fs_ext4 b/runtest/fs_ext4 >> index c65ebab..84b6486 100644 >> --- a/runtest/fs_ext4 >> +++ b/runtest/fs_ext4 >> @@ -1 +1,5 @@ >> -ext4_new_feature_test run_ext4_test.sh >> +ext4-inode-version run_ext4_test.sh ext4_inode_version_test >> +ext4-nsec-timestamps run_ext4_test.sh ext4_nsec_timestamps_test >> +ext4-persist-prealloc run_ext4_test.sh ext4_persist_prealloc_test >> +ext4-subdir-limit run_ext4_test.sh ext4_subdir_limit_test >> +ext4-uninit-groups run_ext4_test.sh ext4_uninit_groups_test >> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/fs/Makefile b/testcases/kernel/fs/Makefile >> index afad6f9..81310f5 100644 >> --- a/testcases/kernel/fs/Makefile >> +++ b/testcases/kernel/fs/Makefile >> @@ -27,6 +27,6 @@ include $(top_srcdir)/include/mk/env_pre.mk >> # XXX (garrcoop): Need to add autoconf checks for JFS. >> # ext4-new-features: This test need to be configured be user. >> # Please read $LTPROOT/README to see the detail information >> -FILTER_OUT_DIRS := dmapi ext4-new-features >> +FILTER_OUT_DIRS := dmapi >> >> include $(top_srcdir)/include/mk/generic_trunk_target.mk >> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/fs/ext4-new-features/Makefile >> b/testcases/kernel/fs/ext4-new-features/Makefile >> index 208b8a6..1ad1c3c 100644 >> --- a/testcases/kernel/fs/ext4-new-features/Makefile >> +++ b/testcases/kernel/fs/ext4-new-features/Makefile >> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ FILTER_OUT_DIRS := $(FFSBDIR) >> FFSB := $(FFSBDIR)/ffsb >> >> $(FFSB): $(FFSBDIR) >> + cd $^; ./configure >> $(MAKE) -C $^ -f "$(abs_srcdir)/$^/Makefile" all >> cp $(FFSBDIR)/ffsb ffsb > The way how ffsb is bundled in LTP is simply wrong, it shouldn't be in > the source tree at all. What I would like to see is to: > > 1. modify testcases that depends on it to return TCONF with > message that explains that ffsb must be installed to run > the testcases if ffsb is not found in PATH > > or alternatively use something different to create the > I/O load > > 2. remove ffsb from the LTP git tree
OK, I will remove the ffsb. >> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/fs/ext4-new-features/run_ext4_test.sh >> b/testcases/kernel/fs/ext4-new-features/run_ext4_test.sh >> index bfbd844..4ede8f7 100755 >> --- a/testcases/kernel/fs/ext4-new-features/run_ext4_test.sh >> +++ b/testcases/kernel/fs/ext4-new-features/run_ext4_test.sh >> @@ -38,11 +38,15 @@ >> >> ################################################################################ >> >> source ext4_funcs.sh; >> +test_features=$1 >> >> export TCID="ext4_new_feature" >> export TST_TOTAL=1 >> export TST_COUNT=1 >> >> +script_name="$test_features"".sh" >> +BLOCK_COUNT=3072 >> + >> tst_kvercmp 2 6 31 >> if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then >> tst_brkm TCONF ignored "kernel is below 2.6.31" >> @@ -71,6 +75,22 @@ if [ ! -f "ext4-test-config" ]; then >> exit 0 >> fi >> >> +# create an ext4 partition >> +dd if=/dev/zero of=fs_ext4_new_features_$$.img bs=1M count=$BLOCK_COUNT >> + >> +if [ $? -ne 0 ];then >> + tst_brkm TCONF ignored "failed to create an ext4 image file" >> + exit 0 >> +fi >> + >> +EXT4_DEV=$(losetup --show -f fs_ext4_new_features_$$.img) >> +if [ $? -ne 0 ];then >> + tst_brkm TCONF ignored "set loop device failed" >> + exit 0 >> +fi >> + >> +echo "EXT4_DEV=$EXT4_DEV" > ./ext4-test-config >> + > We should use DEVICE passed to the runltp script instead, that way we > don't even need this helper (if there is some common code move it to > ex4_funcs.sh and use it from the tests) and call the test scripts > from runtest file directly. The ext4 new features test need a big partition, and the recommended size of this partition is between 5G and 10G, so the DEVICE isn't appropriate. Whether I should create a big partition in runltp script named BIG_DEVICE to run these tests? > > And also remove the configure that asks user about which device to use. > OK. Regards, Xiaoguang Wang. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access Free app hosting. Or install the open source package on any LAMP server. Sign up and see examples for AngularJS, jQuery, Sencha Touch and Native! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63469471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
