Hi!
> +/*
> + * Test for checking functionality of getrlimit(2)
> + */
I've changed this comment to be more verbose about the test purpose.
> @@ -74,94 +31,72 @@
>
> if (TEST_RETURN == -1) {
> - tst_resm(TFAIL, "getrlimit() failed to get %s "
> - "values. errno is %d",
> + tst_resm(TFAIL,
> + "getrlimit() test %s failed errno: %d",
> testcases[i].res_str, TEST_ERRNO);
Changed the TFAIL to TFAIL | TTERRNO instead of the %d.
And pushed both patches, thanks.
PS: Sorry for the late response, I've had quite a lot of work after I've
returned from Christmas vacation.
--
Cyril Hrubis
[email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
