On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 14:20 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > Hi! > > +/* > > + * Test for checking functionality of getrlimit(2) > > + */ > > I've changed this comment to be more verbose about the test purpose. > > > @@ -74,94 +31,72 @@ > > > > if (TEST_RETURN == -1) { > > - tst_resm(TFAIL, "getrlimit() failed to get %s " > > - "values. errno is %d", > > + tst_resm(TFAIL, > > + "getrlimit() test %s failed errno: %d", > > testcases[i].res_str, TEST_ERRNO); > > Changed the TFAIL to TFAIL | TTERRNO instead of the %d. > > And pushed both patches, thanks. > > PS: Sorry for the late response, I've had quite a lot of work after I've > returned from Christmas vacation. >
Thank you. And take it easy. :-) Best regards, Zeng. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
