Hi! On 04/23/2014 07:14 PM, chru...@suse.cz wrote: > Hi! >> I would like to add "posix_fallocate" test based on what we already have >> in syscalls/fallocate, because the behavior of "posix_fallocate" is >> close to what is doing fallocate by default, so most test scenarios will >> be the same. What is the correct way to do it, place it in >> open_posix_testsuite as new ones or add it to fallocate tests? > That is hard to tell. > > If you care for posix_fallocate strictly POSIX conformace add it to > open_posix_testsuite and write the tests accordingly to the POSIX > specification. > > If you care about API coverage add it to the syscalls testcases and > share as much code with the fallocate testcases as possible.
OK, I will add it to syscalls. What I would want is to make a wrapper, then substitute all calls of fallocate with it. And decision which function to call decided inside wrapper using command line option. So they would be called this way: ... fallocate01 fallocate01 fallocate02 fallocate02 fallocate03 fallocate03 posix_fallocate01 fallocate01 -x posix_fallocate02 fallocate02 -x posix_fallocate03 fallocate03 -x ... Thanks, Alexey ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
