Hi!
> >> OK, I will add it to syscalls. What I would want is to make a wrapper,
> >> then substitute all calls of fallocate with it. And decision which
> >> function to call decided inside wrapper using command line option. So
> >> they would be called this way:
> >>
> >> ...
> >> fallocate01 fallocate01
> >> fallocate02 fallocate02
> >> fallocate03 fallocate03
> >>
> >> posix_fallocate01 fallocate01 -x
> >> posix_fallocate02 fallocate02 -x
> >> posix_fallocate03 fallocate03 -x
> >> ...
> > Or you can recompile the the binaries with -DUSE_POSIX_FALLOCATE and use
> > #ifdefs to choose which do you call.
> >
> > Looking at the testcases you will probable need to ifdef a few test
> > assertions (these where mode is not 0) too.
> 
> Just in one place in fallocate01, where it tests "FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE" 
> mode. Still it would probably be better to have a  wrapper at least for 
> posix_fallocate, e.g. to preserve the way the code checks for errors, 
> because it returns error number and doesn't set "errno".

Ah, missed that in the manual page.

Creating wrapper that sets errno and returns -1 in case of
posix_fallocate() sounds reasonably.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chru...@suse.cz

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.  Get 
unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to