Hi! > Sorry about that. That's a mistake and not intended. > I said it took from xfstests in my first email about this patch. I just > forgot to do that after I ping you and re-created this patch several > times. I will notice that in the future. Sorry again. > > BTW, I am 'not' do nothing and just verbatim copy from xfstests. LTP > fsstress.c is not all same with xfstests fsstress.c, I have tried to > make the patch suitable for LTP, and did many test about the patch, to > make sure it's good.
Ok. This information is exactly what should have been included in the commit message. I.e. include the original message from the xfstest commit and add a paragraph about what you did. > You can write the original authors and without my name, I just hope this > feature can be in fsstress. That will useful for our test. The right solution is to keep the original signed-off-by and since you ported the code back to LTP you should also add your signed-off-by. -- Cyril Hrubis chru...@suse.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
