于 2014年09月04日 19:07, [email protected] 写道: > Hi! >> Sorry about that. That's a mistake and not intended. >> I said it took from xfstests in my first email about this patch. I just >> forgot to do that after I ping you and re-created this patch several >> times. I will notice that in the future. Sorry again. >> >> BTW, I am 'not' do nothing and just verbatim copy from xfstests. LTP >> fsstress.c is not all same with xfstests fsstress.c, I have tried to >> make the patch suitable for LTP, and did many test about the patch, to >> make sure it's good. > Ok. This information is exactly what should have been included in the > commit message. I.e. include the original message from the xfstest > commit and add a paragraph about what you did. > >> You can write the original authors and without my name, I just hope this >> feature can be in fsstress. That will useful for our test. > The right solution is to keep the original signed-off-by and since you > ported the code back to LTP you should also add your signed-off-by. > There's no dissent from me, no matter how you will deal with this patch.
Sorry, this is the first time I send patch to LTP. I haven't been familiar about this. I will notice the rules about make patches for upstream in the furture. I don't want to steal other people's contribution, I just hoped everything can be better. Thanks Eryu explain this for me too. Thank you, Zorro Lang ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
