在 2014年10月15日 11:35, Xiaoguang Wang 写道:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/14/2014 07:30 PM, Zorro Lang wrote:
>> 在 2014年10月14日 10:55, Xiaoguang Wang 写道:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 10/13/2014 11:04 PM, Zorro Lang wrote:
>>>> ext4_get_inode_version.sh use $EXT4_DEV, but it really doesn't know what 
>>>> is $EXT4_DEV.
>>>> That cause other cases which use ext4_get_inode_version.sh to fail.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zl...@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> When I ran ext4-inode-version, I always hit TFAIL. But I can't reproduce 
>>>> the failure manually.
>>>> Then I found ext4_inode_version_test.sh use ext4_get_inode_version.sh ->
>>>> ext4_get_inode_version.sh use $EXT4_DEV ->
>>>> but ext4_get_inode_version.sh doesn't know what is $EXT4_DEV.
>>> Yeah, this is a bug :)
>>>> About this patch, I export $EXT4_DEV in ext4_inode_version_test.sh, before 
>>>> it call ext4_get_inode_version.sh.
>>>> But I think add the "export" in front of "EXT4_DEV=$LTP_BIG_DEV" in 
>>>> ext4_funcs.sh will be another method.
>>> I think adding "export EXT4_DEV=$LTP_BIG_DEV" in ext4_funcs.sh would be 
>>> better.
>> Hi xiaoguang,
>>
>> Do you mean patch likes below is better?
> Yeah, it looks good to me.
> I'm not a maintainer :)
>
> Regards,
> Xiaoguang Wang
Oh, still thanks for you;)

But I still need the review from maintainer. Anyone can help?

Thank you,
Zorro Lang
>> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/fs/ext4-new-features/ext4_funcs.sh 
>> b/testcases/kernel/fs/ext4-new-features/ext4_funcs.sh
>> index 0ae534a..b51e942 100755
>> --- a/testcases/kernel/fs/ext4-new-features/ext4_funcs.sh
>> +++ b/testcases/kernel/fs/ext4-new-features/ext4_funcs.sh
>> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ ext4_setup()
>>          if [ -z "$LTP_BIG_DEV" ];then
>>                  tst_brkm TCONF "tests need a big block device(5G-10G)"
>>          else
>> -               EXT4_DEV=$LTP_BIG_DEV
>> +               export EXT4_DEV=$LTP_BIG_DEV
>>          fi
>>
>>          tst_tmpdir
>>
>>
>> If you want to merge this patch, I will resend it as the better way.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Zorro Lang
>>> Regards,
>>> Xiaoguang Wang
>>>
>>>> Please review, and tell me which one do you think is better for LTP? Or 
>>>> you have a better one;)
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Zorro Lang
>>>>
>>>>    .../fs/ext4-new-features/ext4-inode-version/ext4_inode_version_test.sh  
>>>> | 2 ++
>>>>    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git 
>>>> a/testcases/kernel/fs/ext4-new-features/ext4-inode-version/ext4_inode_version_test.sh
>>>>  
>>>> b/testcases/kernel/fs/ext4-new-features/ext4-inode-version/ext4_inode_version_test.sh
>>>> index ac8f021..2549088 100755
>>>> --- 
>>>> a/testcases/kernel/fs/ext4-new-features/ext4-inode-version/ext4_inode_version_test.sh
>>>> +++ 
>>>> b/testcases/kernel/fs/ext4-new-features/ext4-inode-version/ext4_inode_version_test.sh
>>>> @@ -138,6 +138,8 @@ test_inode_version()
>>>>      # main
>>>>    ext4_setup
>>>> +# export EXT4_DEV for ext4_get_inode_version.sh can know it
>>>> +export EXT4_DEV=$EXT4_DEV
>>>>      ext4_test_128_inode_version
>>>>   
>> .
>>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to