Hi! > > The rest looks fine. I may be tempted not to use tst_brkm(TCONF, ...) in > > the test functions and do tst_resm(TCONF, ...); return; instead, but > > that is minor thing. > > It could be better to do so if each test-case (step) was independent, > but each one (except the first) relies on the work done by the previous one.
Ah, right. Then we have no choice but to exit the test. -- Cyril Hrubis chru...@suse.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
