Hi,
On 05/20/2015 04:47 AM, Zeng Linggang wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 07:18 -0400, Jan Stancek wrote:
[ ... ]
>> Wouldn't it be enough to turn that warning into TINFO, for kernels < 3.1?
>>
>> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fallocate/fallocate04.c
>> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fallocate/fallocate04.c
>> index 911bbe8..45d9827 100644
>> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fallocate/fallocate04.c
>> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fallocate/fallocate04.c
>> @@ -158,9 +158,12 @@ static void test02(void)
>> tst_brkm(TFAIL | TERRNO, cleanup,
>> "fallocate() or lseek() failed");
>> }
>> - tst_resm(TWARN | TERRNO, "lseek() doesn't support
>> SEEK_HOLE");
>> + if (tst_kvercmp(3, 1, 0) < 0)
> How about put them before lseek(SEEK_HOLE) ?
>
> if (tst_kvercmp(3, 1, 0) < 0) {
> fill_tst_buf();
> memset();
> check_file_data();
> } else {
> lseek(SEEK_HOLE);
> ...
> }
Please don't complicate the test-case with this, I agree with Jan, it is
enough to add the kernel version check. It can be as follows:
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fallocate/fallocate04.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fallocate/fallocate04.c
@@ -158,7 +158,8 @@ static void test02(void)
tst_brkm(TFAIL | TERRNO, cleanup,
"fallocate() or lseek() failed");
}
- tst_resm(TWARN | TERRNO, "lseek() doesn't support
SEEK_HOLE");
+ tst_resm((tst_kvercmp(3, 1, 0) < 0) ? TINFO : (TWARN |
TERRNO),
+ "lseek() doesn't support SEEK_HOLE");
}
tst_resm(TINFO, "found a hole at '%ld' offset", ret);
Best regards,
Alexey
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
