Hi,

On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Cui Bixuan <cuibix...@huawei.com> wrote:

> On 2015/7/31 14:24, Li Wang wrote:
>
> > Then, I came up with a idea that I don't include the ltp-lib file in
> 'msgrcv08.c',
> > and just add two lines in the .../ipc/msgrcv/Makefile:
> >
> >   msgrcv08:
> >       gcc -g -O2 -Wall -m32 msgrcv08.c -o msgrcv08
> >
> > It works for me, but I know it's not appropriate for LTP management.
> >
> > What should I do? or, Is there any good way to solve this problem?
> Hi,
>     For LTP, we can run './configure CC=[SDK-32]; make;' to compile 32-bit
> testcases.
> So, I think, if the case 'msgrcv08.c' will not work as 64-bit application,
> it can check the
> SDK first. And do 'TCONF: not gcc32' if it's 64-bit application.
>

Thanks for review.  Do u know how to check the SDK first in msgrcv08.c
file?

For me, LTP always running on 64-bit system. So I wanted to run this case
with others(msgrcv0*[1-7}) at the same time. seems like it's very difficult
to achieve.


>
>     It's not a good idea that ipc/msgrcv/Makefile to control it, I mean,
> LTP user to control
> it in ./configure which will be better.
>

>     What do you think?
>

Agree, it's not wise to control the case by Makefile.  and,  it's easy to
get TCONF but hard to get it work.


> Thanks,
> Cui Bixuan
>
> >
> > Thanks~
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
>



-- 
Regards,
Li Wang
Email: liw...@redhat.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to