On 11/01/2010 02:05 PM, Petr Machata wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working with Zach's github tree. There, configure requires > libelf.pc to be installed. > > I don't think that's correct, there's at least one other libelf > available in elfutils, which has incompatible versioning and doesn't > ship the .pc file. It's available on Red Hat-line of linuxes: Fedora, > RHEL, Centos, where, as far as I can tell, libelf isn't in the > repositories. > > I think autoconf should be rewritten to ask for libelf the traditional > way, that is to ask for libelf functions that we use. I'd like to know > your opinion before I start throwing patches around.
Sounds like a plan. I've added a patch to my repo that uses the
traditional way, if pkg-config fails. Testes on ubuntu with feroa's
libelfutils.
cheers, Marc
--
The following changes since commit 14fb133518a1ad91e58852c960370d32ad8f36e7:
Add -w/--where to show backtraces of traced functions. (2010-10-31 14:26:59
-0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.pengutronix.de/git/mkl/ltrace.git fix/libelf-wo-pc
Marc Kleine-Budde (2):
configure: use AS_HELP_STRING to pretty print help text
configure: add pkg-config-less libelf detection
configure.ac | 18 +++++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Ltrace-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/ltrace-devel
