On 11/03/2010 02:34 PM, Petr Machata wrote: > 03.11.2010 13:12, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> The downside for this approach is that now everything that is linked is >> linked against libelf, even the convenience libs. >> >> /bin/bash ../../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -Wall -O2 >> -o ../libcpu.la plt.lo regs.lo trace.lo -lelf >> >> But that's just a cosmetic problem, doesn't affect the file size. I've >> tested it with with libelfs on ubuntu. You can add my Tested-by: >> >>> Since there was no answer, my proposal became a pull request. Included >>> in that pull request is Marc's AS_HELP_STRING patch. >>> https://github.com/ice799/ltrace/pull/3 >> >> When doing kernel development it's usual add you S-o-b to the patches >> from other people if you add then to you own branch. How do you handle >> it in ltrace? > > I don't think we do. I can add those tags if you feel strong about > this. I don't think that doing forced updates in context of a project > like ltrace is a terrible problem, so I can update the branch even at > this point.
no need to.... :) Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Ltrace-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/ltrace-devel
