17.11.2010 05:11, Joe Damato wrote:
I managed to get access to a few different architectures via the GCC
compile farm to test ltrace. These are my findings.
Architectures I could not get access to and have not tested:
s390
I have an access to this, will try it before weekend.
Architectures I have access to but ltrace does not compile:
ppc32
I had a fix for this higher up my "pmachata" branch. I extracted the
fix to a "ppc" branch and converted it to a pull request.
https://github.com/pmachata/ltrace/commits/ppc
x86 - 2 test failures (parameters.exp tests)
Logs would be welcome, but I suspect these are known-wrong, meaning
always have been buggy, but now there are tests for it.
ia64 - 4 test failures (parameters.exp and libdl)
ppc64 - 43 test failures (my ppc64 build was EXTREMELY hacky and may
not have been done properly, this could use double checking by some
one with more ppc64 experience)
There's a couple failures in parameters.exp on your master, but no such
disaster.
It is unclear to me which of these builds previously failed and which
failures are new. I can go through and check Juan's master against
each of these architectures and see if things got better, worse, or
stayed the same. If things got better or stayed the same, I'd be
inclined to just release what we have and then include bugfixes in a
soon to follow minor revision.
I'd be inclined to support this. Ltrace is in better shape now than it
was a month ago.
PM
_______________________________________________
Ltrace-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/ltrace-devel
